Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Peel

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 29, 1989No. 60,084; ACM 26000PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

A general court-martial composed of officer members tried appellant at Royal Air Force (RAF) Mildenhall, England, for the rapes of Carol Bishop and Judith Curtis, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 920, and for three assaults on Tracey Cooper and two assaults on Julie Jones, in violation of Article 128, UCMJ, 10 USC § 928. Peel pleaded not guilty to all charges and was acquitted of one assault on Ms. Cooper and another on Ms. Jones. However, he was convicted of all the other offenses and was sentenced to a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. DossUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. HouserUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  2. United States v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  3. United States v. HibbardCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  4. United States v. FlesherCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
  5. United States v. MeeksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API