Coghlan v. Quartararo
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
Plaintiff Coghlan brought suit against Weisman Bros., as the contractor, and Salvatore Quartararo, as the owner, to recover a balance unpaid him, as subcontractor, for lathing and plastering a building constructed by Weisman Bros, for said Quartararo.
The other plaintiffs joined in bringing a similar action against the same defendants, the Swett-Davenport Lumber Company, seeking to recover for lumber furnished the contractor for said building, and Lettich-Foin Company, seeking to recover for the plumbing of said building.
Weisman Bros, defaulted and never appeared. The actions were consolidated…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Willamette Steam Mills Lumbering & Manufacturing Co. v. Los Angeles College Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Angus v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Greig v. RiordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Miller v. LucoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Kellogg v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lineman v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Millar v. MillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Stanton v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Young v. VailNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Dover Lumber Co. v. CaseIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.