Legal Opinion

Kellogg v. Howes

California Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1889No. 13324PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

This action was brought by the respondents as material-men, laborers, and subcontractors against the appellants, to enforce a lien for material furnished and for labor done in the construction of a dwelling-house. The appellant Howes was the owner of the real estate, and contracted with his co-defendant to construct the building, and the latter contracted with the respondents for the labor and material done and furnished by them. The contract price for constructing the building was more than one thousand dollars, and the contract was not filed for record as required by section 1183 of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Giant Powder Co. v. San Diego Flume Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Bowen v. AubreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Southern California Lumber Co. v. SchmittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Renton v. ConleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Dore v. SellersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. McClain v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Himrich v. CarpenterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Gibbs v. TallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Laidlaw v. MaryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API