Legal Opinion

Millar v. Millar

California Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1917No. Sac. No. 2415PublishedCited by 91 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Metson, Drew & Mackenzie, R. G.. Hudson, and Marion De Vries, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.

Katherine Millar brought this action against James Millar for separate maintenance. Millar answered denying the validity of the marriage, and by way of cross-complaint alleged that his consent thereto was obtained by fraud. He asked that the marriage be annulled. Judgment was given for him, annulling the marriage. The appeal is taken by plaintiff from the judgment and the order denying her motion for a new trial, and also from an order denying her motion for a further allowance of costs and counsel fees.

Millar died after the judgment had been entered and pending the appeal.

It is earnestly…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Coats v. CoatsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. In Re the Estate of GregorsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Miller v. LucoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Smith v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of SkelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Estate of LundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Duss v. DussSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  5. Sanguinetti v. SanguinettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API