Legal Opinion
Lineman v. Schmid
California Supreme Court
Decided July 9, 1948No. L. A. 20486PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
On December 31, 1938, R. L. Rice commenced an action against several defendants to recover damages for breach of a contract to purchase flour executed on July 16, 1937. On May 20, 1946, a judgment for the plaintiff was entered awarding $10,905.95 as damages with interest at 7 per cent from December 2, 1938, the date of the breach. The defendants appealed.
At the date of the contract John Schmid operated the Eagle Bakery in Los Angeles. R. L. Rice was a jobber in flour, buying on his own account and selling to bakeries. The brands of flour covered by the contract, Ravalli, Gold Cross, and Isis,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Gray v. BekinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Selleck v. FrenchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
- Rice v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Rafael Chodos, an Individual v. West Publishing Company, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation Doing Business in California Dba Bancroft-Whitney CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Mysse v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
- Tripp v. SwoapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.