Legal Opinion
Young v. Vail
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1924No. 2691PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT.
BOTTS, J.
Hettie Campbell and ber husband executed and delivered to the Maxwell Irrigated Land Company tbeir promissory note, together with a real estate mortgage to secure the payment thereof. This mortgage seems to have been subject to a first mortgage on the same premises. The Campbells sold the mortgaged premises to the appellants Young and Ferguson. The mortgage provided that in case of failure to pay taxes, interest, or other charges, the mortgagee might treat the whole of said indebtedness as due. The plaintiff, John F.. Vail, thereafter filed his suit to foreclose,…
2Cases cited102 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Carpenter v. LonganSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Gormley v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Noonan v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Bernard Damsky, Olga Damsky and Henry Birns v. Honorable Joseph C. Zavatt, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Bliss v. GreenwoodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
- Savings Bank of New London v. SantanielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- State Bank of Lehi v. WoolseyUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Clark v. Teeven Holding Co., Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1992
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.