Legal Opinion

Miller v. Luco

California Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1889No. 12921PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

This is an action to quiet the plaintiffs* title to land in San Diego County. The land is "alleged to belong to the estate of Thomas T. Bouldin, deceased, and the plaintiff Miller sues as special administrator of the estate, and the other plaintiffs as legatees and heirs of deceased. Defendant demurred to the complaint, on the ground that Miller had not legal capacity to sue; that the alleged heirs were improperly joined with the special administrator; that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that the complaint was uncertain and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Coveny v. HaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Coffey v. GreenfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Camarillo v. FenlonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Germania Building & Loan Ass'n v. WagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Millar v. MillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. In Re Estate of HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Murphy v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Johnson v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API