Legal Opinion
Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. Loescher
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 28, 1980No. 50064PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHERAN, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff brought suit to enjoin defendant from working for a competitor, alleging that such an action was precluded by a noncompetition clause in a prior employment contract. To this end, plaintiff obtained a temporary restraining order, a condition of which was the filing of a bond. After a full trial, the district court ruled in favor of the defendant, refusing to issue a permanent injunction and vacating the restraining order. After some further discovery, the defendant moved for an assessment of damages caused him by the tempo rary restraining order and for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Patent Scaffolding Co. v. William Simpson Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- H & R Block, Inc., Cross v. George R. McCaslin D/B/A the Tax Man, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Bang v. International Sisal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Washington Ex Rel. Washington v. Barnes HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Midland Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Mercy Clinics, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- Hueper v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Motor Vehicle Administration of the Maryland Department of Transportation v. Seidel Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Windsor School District v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.