AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
This action involves two appeals by defendant, Harkins Bowling, Inc., which we shall consider separately. The first is from orders of the district court (1) denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the temporary restraining order and granting the motion of plaintiff, AMF Pinspotters, Inc., for a temporary injunction, and (2) denying defend ant’s motion to vacate and dismiss the temporary injunction. The second appeal is from a district court order granting plaintiff’s motion to strike defendant’s antitrust defenses.
Parti
Due to the somewhat prolonged procedural history…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thomas v. RambergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- J. F. Quest Foundry Co. v. International Molders & Foundry Workers UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Steller v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Nielsen v. City of Albert LeaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- General Minnesota Utilities Co. v. Carlton County Cooperative Power Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Vaughn & Co. v. SaulCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Humenansky v. Minnesota Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. LoescherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.