Legal Opinion

Hueper v. Goodrich

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 22, 1982No. 81-21PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TODD, Justice.

Bruce Hueper, a minor, was seriously injured in an auto accident. A lawsuit was commenced on his behalf for his injuries and his father brought action for his medical expenses. The trial was bifurcated as to liability and damages. Following the damages trial, the court allowed the father full recovery of the reasonable value of medical expenses, including hospital services furnished without charge, under the collateral source rule. The trial court also allowed interest on the amount of the defendants’ insurance policy from the date of the liability trial. We affirm as to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Dahlin v. KronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. LoescherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Faber v. RoelofsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Imlay v. City of Lake CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Mitchell v. HaldarSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  3. American Standard Insurance v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  4. Swanson v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. District of Columbia v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API