Russell v. Farley
Supreme Court of the United States
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota. ■ The case is fully stated in the opinion of the eourt.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beadley
This case comes before us by appeal from a decree in a case in equity wherein Jesse P. Farley, as receiver of certain branch lines of the St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company, and of all lands and other property appurtenant thereto, was complainant, and the firm of De Graff & Co., the Northern Pacific Railroad Company, the Lake Superior and Mississippi Railroad Company, B. S.- Russell, G. W. Cass, receiver .of the Northern Pacific Railroad Company, and C. W. Mead, .general manager of said company, were defendants. The complainant was appointed receiver Aug. 1, 1873, in a foreclosure suit…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Canter v. American InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Bein v. HeathSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Elastic Fabrics Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
3Cited by207 opinions
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,417 Stephen Blumenthal and Les Fein v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Inland Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Meyers v. BlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
202 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.