Legal Opinion

Bang v. International Sisal Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 27, 1942No. 33,010PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 4 N.W.2d 113. Action for breach of an employment contract in which, after favorable findings for plaintiff, the employer appeals from the judgment, contending that the evidence compels the view that the employe was discharged for cause. This represents the principal controversy between the parties, but in the view we take of the case collateral questions require solution.

Plaintiff was employed as sales and good-will representative by defendant for one year commencing November 1, 1939, at a monthly salary of $150 and traveling expenses. Under their contract, plaintiff was to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McClelland v. Climax Hosiery MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Hollwedel v. Duffy-Mott Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. May v. New York Motion Picture Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Von Heyne v. TompkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Grand Forks Lumber Co. v. McClure Logging Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Dehnart v. Waukesha Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Nielsen v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Technical Computer Services, Inc. v. BuckleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Washington Welfare Ass'n, Inc. v. PoindexterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Billetter v. PosellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API