Legal Opinion

Motor Vehicle Administration of the Maryland Department of Transportation v. Seidel Chevrolet, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 10, 1992No. 45, September Term, 1991PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KARWACKI, Judge.

In this case we focus on Maryland Code (1977, 1987 Repl.Vol.), §§ 13-209 and 13-210 of the Transportation Article which establish an Assurance Fund (“Fund”) within the Motor Vehicle Administration (“MVA”) to compensate “any interested person [who] has sustained [a] loss or damage” due to “an omission or error in the filing, recording, or indexing of a security interest ... made by an employee of [MVA] in the course of employment.” The principal question in the case is whether, and if so how much, the respondent/cross-petitioner, Seidel Chevrolet, Inc. (“Seidel”) is entitled to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Morris v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Katz v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Mazor v. State, Dep't of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Mustafa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Board of Trustees v. John K. Ruff, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Lockshin v. SemskerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. CassidyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Gordon Family Partnership v. Gar on JerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Debbas v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API