Legal Opinion
Day v. D.C. Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 12, 2002No. Civ.A.01-0887(RMU)PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRanting Defendant Lowery’s Motion to Dismiss; Ordering Further Briefing on the Elected Official Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss; Resolving All Other Pending Motions
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This civil-rights action comes before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction or, alternatively, for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. The pro se plaintiff, William R. Day, also known as Ahmed Assalaam (“the plaintiff’ or “Mr. Day”), brings suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that on various…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Williams v. GEICO CORP.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Franklin v. PotterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Candido v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Cheeks v. Fort Myer Construction Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Sewell v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.