Legal Opinion
Candido v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 22, 2007No. Civil Action No. 06-00128 (RBW)PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On January 24, 2006, the plaintiff commenced this action challenging the District of Columbia’s (“District”) sale of the plaintiffs vehicle without notice to him on the ground that the sale violated the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. Complaint (“Compl.”) H10. Currently before this Court is the District’s Motion for Summary Judgment with supporting memoranda (“Def.’s Mot. for Summ. J.”) and the plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Default Against Defendant (“Pl.’s Mot. for Default”).1 Upon consideration of the parties’ motions, the Court concludes that both…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- JAIYEOLA v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Jouanny v. Embassy of France in the United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Strong-Fischer v. PetersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Nattah v. BushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.