Legal Opinion

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 21, 1971No. 301PublishedCited by 16,001 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

The Fourth Amendment provides that:

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated . . . ."

In Bell v. Hood, 327 U. S. 678 (1946), we reserved the question whether violation of that command by a federal agent acting under color of his authority gives rise to a cause of action for damages consequent upon his unconstitutional conduct. Today we hold that it does.

This case has its origin in an arrest and search carried out on the morning of November 26, 1965. Petitioner's complaint alleged that…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16,001 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

15,996 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API