Legal Opinion
Williams v. GEICO CORP.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 20, 2011No. Civil Action 10-01420(JDB)PublishedCited by 122 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Rodney Williams (‘Williams”) brings this action against his former employer, the Government Employees Insurance Company (“GEICO”), alleging violations of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12112. GEICO has filed a motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process and, in the alternative, moves to dismiss or transfer for improper venue. For the reasons explained below, the Court will deny the motion to dismiss and instead will transfer this action to the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- McCain v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Douglas v. Chariots for HireDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Lemon v. KramerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Ananiev v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Ellis-Smith v. Secretary of the ArmyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.