Conley v. Gibson
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
Once again Negro employees are here under the Railway Labor Act 1 asking that their collective bargaining agent be compelled to represent them fairly. In a series of cases beginning with Steele v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., 323 U. S. 192, this Court has emphatically and repeatedly ruled that an exclusive bargaining agent under the Railway Labor Act is obligated to represent all employees in the bargaining unit fairly and without discrimination because of race and has held that the courts have power to protect employees against such invidious discrimination. 2
This class suit was brought in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Dioguardi v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30,357 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
30,352 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.