Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. RSJ, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 29, 1996No. C1-94-2365PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
The Minnesota Department of Human Rights (MDHR) seeks review of a court of appeals decision dismissing the MDHR’s complaint against RSJ, Inc. and Joseph Schaefer (Schaefer). The complaint alleges that RSJ, Inc. engaged in unlawful sex discrimination, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 363.03, subd. 1(2) (1988), and reprisal, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 363.03, subd. 7, and that Schaefer aided, abetted, compelled, or coerced RSJ, Inc.’s unfair discriminatory practices in violation of Minn.Stat. § 363.03, subd. 6.
After a hearing on the complaint, Administrative Law Judge Steve…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Danz v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Wenger v. WengerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Turner v. IDS Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Guinness Import Company v. Mark Vii Distributors, Inc., Third-Party v. Desnoes & Geddes, Ltd., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet TahoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Gomon v. Northland Family Physicians, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Hince v. O'KEEFESupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.