Legal Opinion
Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass'n
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 3, 2000No. C7-99-1191PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINGER, Justice.
Respondent Jean E. Scott and her husband Paul W. Scott, a Minneapolis police officer, were married in 1947. In 1979, the Scotts sold their house and separated. Both of the Scotts moved in with other people after separating, however they never divorced and continued to file joint tax returns until Paul Scott’s death in August of 1995. After his death Jean Scott applied for pension benefits from the appellant, the Minneapolis Police Relief Association (MPRA), as a surviving spouse. The MPRA denied her request, claiming that MmmStat. § 423B.10, subd. 1(a) (1998), which…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Kolton v. County of AnokaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. LariveeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. BenniefieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the CHILD OF R.D.L. and J.W., ParentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.