Legal Opinion
Gomon v. Northland Family Physicians, Ltd.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 13, 2002No. C8-00-1465PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
Appellants Kirk N. Gomon and Carol Gomon brought a medical malpractice action against respondents Northland Family Physicians, Ltd. and Harvey D. Smith, M.D. The St. Louis County District Court granted respondents’ motion for summary judgment, finding that the action was barred under the two-year statute of limitations in force at the time the cause of action accrued. The court of appeals affirmed. Because we hold that Minn.Stat. § 541.076 (2000) applies retroactively to revive an action that was time-barred before the effective date of the new statute, we reverse.
O…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Wichelman v. MessnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. RSJ, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. McCoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. WukawitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Molloy v. MeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.