Legal Opinion
Hince v. O'KEEFE
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 9, 2001No. C0-00-49PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Paul H„ Justice.
Appellants are individuals civilly committed to the Minnesota Sex Offender Program (Sex Offender Program). Appellants commenced a declaratory judgment action seeking a determination that the Commissioner of the Department of Human Services is required to establish a review board for the Sex Offender Program treatment facilities under Minn.Stat. § 253B.22, subd. 1 (2000). In their complaint, appellants assert that they should be treated like mentally ill and dangerous patients with respect to the establishment of a review board. They also assert constitutional…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Minnesota Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- In Re BlodgettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Martin Ex Rel. Hoff v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Serna v. GoodnoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- State v. KoenigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Kolton v. County of AnokaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.