Legal Opinion
Danz v. Jones
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 3, 1978No. 47226PublishedCited by 96 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YETKA, Justice.
This is an action by plaintiff, Shirley Danz, individually, against Helen Dybsjord and Mark Z. Jones II, and against Mark Z. Jones Associates, Inc. (Associates), alleging sex discrimination in employment practices in violation of Minn.St. 363.03, subd. l(2)(c). 1 Plaintiff alleged that she had not received equal pay for performing work that was identical to that of a certain male employee of Associates.
At the close of the plaintiff’s case, the action against the individual defendants, Dybsjord and Jones, was dismissed. Thereafter, the trial court in its conclusions of law, held…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Martha D. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Brookhaven General HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Sigurdson v. Isanti CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Lois E. Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Continental Can Co. Ex Rel. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.