Legal Opinion

Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic Security

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 9, 1986No. C1-85-723PublishedCited by 175 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Keith J. Tuma, seeks further review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, which upheld the Commissioner of Economic Security’s ruling that Tuma is ineligible for extended unemployment benefits under Minn.Stat. § 268.071(1984). The Commissioner, through her representative, denied Tuma extended benefits because Tuma was allegedly $60 short of the total wage credits needed under Minn.Stat. § 268.071, subd. 3(3), to qualify. In calculating Tuma’s wage credits under subdivision 3(3), however, the Commissioner excluded Tuma’s final paycheck on the grounds that it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Arvig Telephone Co. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Beck v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Peterson v. HauleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. McCaleb v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Minnesota Microwave, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by175 opinions

  1. Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. Current Technology Concepts, Inc. v. Irie Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Burkstrand v. BurkstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Phelps v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Larson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API