Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic Security
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
Appellant, Keith J. Tuma, seeks further review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, which upheld the Commissioner of Economic Security’s ruling that Tuma is ineligible for extended unemployment benefits under Minn.Stat. § 268.071(1984). The Commissioner, through her representative, denied Tuma extended benefits because Tuma was allegedly $60 short of the total wage credits needed under Minn.Stat. § 268.071, subd. 3(3), to qualify. In calculating Tuma’s wage credits under subdivision 3(3), however, the Commissioner excluded Tuma’s final paycheck on the grounds that it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Arvig Telephone Co. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Beck v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Peterson v. HauleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- McCaleb v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Minnesota Microwave, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by175 opinions
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Current Technology Concepts, Inc. v. Irie Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Burkstrand v. BurkstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Phelps v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Larson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.