Legal Opinion

Pitt v. Mallalieu

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1948No. Civ. 16184PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

By this second amended complaint, herein referred to as the “complaint,” plaintiff sought to enforce specific performance of his agreement dated April 14, 1944, to purchase two lots in the city of Pasadena. The price was $9,500, of which $250 was paid at the time he signed the agreement, the balance payable within 90 days “into escrow with the Pasadena Escrow & Safe Deposit Company ... for the benefit of the seller together with the above deposit” of $250. Six conventional conditions followed the last quoted language and they are printed on the margin hereof. * Plaintiff paid no money into…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Cleary v. FolgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Roesch v. De MotaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Major-Blakeney Corp. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Galdjie v. DarwishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Groobman v. KirkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API