Legal Opinion

Roesch v. De Mota

California Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1944No. Sac. 5513PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs as parties beneficially interested in certain mining property in Calaveras County, for an accounting and to enjoin a scheduled sale by the trustee under two deeds of trust. Plaintiff Roesch is the beneficiary under a junior deed of trust held by her, and which was foreclosed. At the foreclosure sale John S. DeLancey bought the property and holds title for the benefit of plaintiffs and Calaveras Central Mining Corporation and Calaveras Central Gold Mining Co., Ltd., as their interests may appear. The other two plaintiffs are judgment creditors of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Wienke v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Esposti v. Rivers Brothers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Matthews v. OrmerdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Charles A. Riley Co. v. W. T. Sears & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. June Newirth v. Aegis Senior Communities, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. City of Ukiah v. FonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Santa Clara County Department of Family & Children's Services v. D.W.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Wolf v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API