Legal Opinion

Groobman v. Kirk

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 1958No. Civ. 22911PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

Plaintiff and appellant, hereafter referred to as “buyer,” appeals from an adverse judgment in an action for specific performance of a contract of sale of real property. The defendants and respondents are the administrators of the estate of Nellie L. Kirk who died after the case was submitted, but before judgment. Mrs. Kirk was the seller of the property and will hereafter be referred to as the “seller.”

In the court below the cause was submitted for decision at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case, defendant seller offering no evidence. Hence there is no dispute as to the essential facts. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Katemis v. WesterlindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Miller v. DyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Gervaise v. BrookinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Pitt v. MallalieuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Peckham v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Merrill v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  2. Diamond v. HuenergardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Doryon v. SalantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Kossler v. Palm Springs Developments, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Leiter v. EltingeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API