Legal Opinion

Barkis v. Scott

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1949No. S. F. 17719PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Defendants have appealed from a judgment quieting plaintiff’s title to a parcel of real property. In 1941, plaintiff and defendants executed a contract whereby defendants agreed to purchase plaintiff’s house and lot in Oakland. Seven hundred dollars was paid down and the balance of $5,450 with 6 per cent interest was to be paid at the rate of $42.50 per month. The contract provided that payments were to be made on the fifteenth day of each month and that “If Default should be made in the payment of any of the said sums of principal, interest or installments at maturity thereof, all moneys…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. O'MORROW v. BoradCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Stevinson v. JoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. People v. CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Major-Blakeney Corp. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Baffa v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Honey v. Henry's Franchise Leasing Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API