Foley v. City of Yankton
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DUNN, Chief Justice.
The plaintiffs in their amended complaint sought to prohibit the defendant city from making'any further deposits of refuse, debris or garbage upon or near the north embankment of an arm or chute of the Missouri River between Rush Island, owned by plaintiffs, and the defendant’s land (Lot 4) which had been used as a dump ground since 1939; they also sought a mandatory injunction requiring the city to remove from this arm of the Missouri River above described any and all refuse, garbage, debris or material allegedly deposited there by the defendant in the past. The trial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pradelt v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
- Graven v. BackusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Sleeper v. KillionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Parsons v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- Viestenz v. Arthur TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sherburn v. Patterson Farms, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Magner v. BrinkmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Harksen v. PeskaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Knodel v. Kassel TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Maryhouse, Inc. v. HamiltonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.