Viestenz v. Arthur Township
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGrimson, J.
This is a suit in equity for a mandatory injunction. As grounds therefor plaintiffs allege that the defendants in constructing the public highways bounding plaintiffs’ lands failed to do that in accordance with scientific highway construction and engineering; that they have obstructed the natural *1031drainage of the surface waters by the embankments of the highway; that as a result thereof the surface waters from adjoining lands overflow the highway ditches and flood large portions of plaintiffs’ land; that plaintiffs suffer irreparable damage therefrom; that they have no adequate remedy at law.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- O'Brien v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Sweigart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
- Carroll v. Township of RyeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Bartels Northern Oil Co. v. JackmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Medical Arts Clinic, P.C. v. Franciscan Initiatives, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Little v. Burleigh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
- Huber v. Oliver CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Olson v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Kadlec v. Greendale Township Board of Township SupervisorsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.