Legal Opinion

Knodel v. Kassel Township

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1998No. NonePublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] To stop a neighbor’s surface water from draining through his property, a landowner plugged a road culvert. Four decades later, when they learned of the nonfunctioning culvert, the Township supervisors declared their intent to unplug it, and the landowner sought an injunction. Can the landowner prevent reopening the culvert on the grounds (1) the Township delayed too long in discovering and repairing ⅛ (2) the landowner acquired a prescriptive easement to be free from the flow of surface water from upper land; or (3) the neighbor abandoned any dominant drainage…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Gross v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Dacy v. GorsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Sharp v. 251st Street Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sherburn v. Patterson Farms, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Magner v. BrinkmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Halls v. WhiteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Hendrickson v. Wagners, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Sjomeling v. StuberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API