Magner v. Brinkman
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] Michael A. Magner and Denise W. Williams (Plaintiffs) sued Glenn J. and Susan Brinkman (Defendants) for allegedly causing an increased amount of water drainage on Plaintiffs’ land by altering the natural flow of water across Defendants’ land. Defendants appeal the circuit court’s judgment entered after a jury trial, arguing that they were entitled to judgment as a matter of law because Plaintiffs failed to offer proof that Defendants caused the increase in drainage. Defendants also argue that the court abused its discretion in granting Plaintiffs a permanent…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Hall v. Folger Coffee Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Badillo v. Mid Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Krywin v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
- Willard Buskirk v. Apollo Metals Pma Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Mordhorst v. Dakota Truck Underwriters & Risk Administration ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Center of Life Church v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Rumpzka v. ZubkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Weiland v. BumannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
- Underhill v. MattsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.