Legal Opinion

Harksen v. Peska

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1998No. NonePublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Gene Peska purchased a tract of land in the Black Hills of South Dakota and built a “cabin”1 thereon. A neighboring property owner, John Harksen, later brought suit to enforce restrictive covenants that limited the number of buildings that could be built on the land. In a bifurcated trial, the trial court determined that the restrictive covenants were not ambiguous, and that a mandatory injunction for the removal of the cabin should issue. Peska appeals. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

FACTS

[¶2.] On April 30, 1969, John C. Farrar and Ray J.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Baker v. WilburnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Morgan v. VeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Eberle v. McKeownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Piechowski v. CaseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sherburn v. Patterson Farms, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Halls v. WhiteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Jackson v. Canyon Place Homeowner's Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Cotton v. ManningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Harksen v. PeskaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API