Harksen v. Peska
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] Gene Peska purchased a tract of land in the Black Hills of South Dakota and built a “cabin”1 thereon. A neighboring property owner, John Harksen, later brought suit to enforce restrictive covenants that limited the number of buildings that could be built on the land. In a bifurcated trial, the trial court determined that the restrictive covenants were not ambiguous, and that a mandatory injunction for the removal of the cabin should issue. Peska appeals. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
FACTS
[¶2.] On April 30, 1969, John C. Farrar and Ray J.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Baker v. WilburnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Morgan v. VeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Eberle v. McKeownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Piechowski v. CaseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sherburn v. Patterson Farms, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Halls v. WhiteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Jackson v. Canyon Place Homeowner's Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Cotton v. ManningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Harksen v. PeskaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.