Legal Opinion

Parsons v. City of Sioux Falls

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1937No. File No. 7954PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

Plaintiff owns and resides on a farm of 233 acres situate about seven miles east of Sioux Falls. This action was instituted in the circuit court of Minnehaha county to restrain the city from discharging sewage into the Big Sioux river which runs through plaintiff’s fa.rm and to recover damages caused by the pollution of the river. The court 'did not grant an injunction, but awarded damages -to the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed from the judgment and an order -denying morion for new trial.

It appears from the evidence on behalf of the plaintiff that for many years the city discharged…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Harrisonville v. W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Platt Bros. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  5. Grey ex rel. Simmons v. Mayor of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Black v. GardnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Rupert v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Friedman v. City of Forest CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  4. Bogue v. Clay CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Holzworth v. RothSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API