Graven v. Backus
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TEIGEN, Chief Justice.
We are involved here with an appeal by the plaintiff and a cross-appeal by the defendant. Both appeals are from the judgment. The case was tried to the court without a jury and the plaintiff, as appellant, has demanded a trial de novo. The defendant, as cross-appellant, has limited his appeal to specifications of error which were served with the notice of appeal.
The subject of the action involves an encroachment of the defendant’s building upon the plaintiff’s land.
The plaintiff, by his complaint, seeks to quiet title to the property encroached upon against the defendant…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Morgan v. VeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- O'CONNOR v. ImmeleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Kucera v. KuceraNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Burgum v. HookerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
- Sittner v. MistelskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Matter of Estate of HillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Wojahn v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Burr v. Trinity Medical CenterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Harrington v. HarringtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Burns v. GoffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.