Legal Opinion

Sherburn v. Patterson Farms, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1999No. NonePublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSabers, J.

[¶ 1.] Ronnie Patterson and Patterson Farms, Inc. (Patterson) appeal an order by the circuit court which denied a prescriptive easement and issued a permanent injunction requiring Patterson to either remove a dike located on his property or install culverts to allow for the flow of water at ground level. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] On February 21, 1994, John Sher-burn sued Patterson seeking to enjoin Patterson from obstructing the flow of water across his land. Patterson’s property is located north of Sherburn’s property. 1 Sher-burn claimed that a dike…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of Colton v. SchwebachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Gross v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Jasper v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Schuldies v. MillarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Wolff v. Secretary of the South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks DepartmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. City of Deadwood v. Summit, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Weitzel v. Sioux Valley Heart PartnersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In Re South Dakota Microsoft Antitrust LitigationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Cable v. UNION COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Hendrix v. SchulteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API