Legal Opinion

Hutteball v. Montgomery

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1936No. 26108. Department OnePublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries and the loss of personal property caused by a collision between automobiles on a highway in Utah. There was a verdict for the plaintiffs, Denny B. Hutteball and wife, against the defendant, O. B. Montgomery. The defendant has appealed from a judgment on the verdict.

Respondents were going easterly, the appellant was going westerly. The collision occurred about ten o’clock in the morning at a point where the road was level, eighteen feet wide, and straight several miles each way. By a complaint on the part of the plaintiffs and a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burlie v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Torgeson v. HanfordWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Clark v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Showers v. A. H. Jones Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Cole v. SchaubWashington Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Hansen v. RothausWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Bohnsack v. KirkhamWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Theonnes v. HazenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. Fitzgerald v. United States Lines Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API