Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Rothaus

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1986No. 52104-2PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

The issue is whether appellant vessel owners are entitled to prejudgment interest on agreed damages. The vessel owners sued respondent insurance brokers for damages allegedly suffered as a result of the brokers' failure to provide them with insurance as agreed or as represented. The parties entered into an agreement settling all claims except the vessel owners' entitlement to prejudgment interest on the agreed damages. The trial court ruled that the vessel owners' claims were ordinary negligence claims for which prejudgment interest is not awardable. Upon direct review, we affirm in part on…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Bostain v. Food Express, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API