Torgeson v. Hanford
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered February 8, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action in tort.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The purpose of this action was to recover for medical attendance, for hospital fees, and for the loss of services of the plaintiff’s son, Albert Torgeson, a newsboy, who, on the 17th day of September, 1908, was injured by an automobile owned by Clarence Hanford, one of the defendants, while it was being driven by his son, Lauron Hanford.
Subsequent to the accident, the father, as guardian ad litem for his son, brought suit against Clarence Hanford to recover damages for personal injuries, which resulted in a verdict and judgment in the sum of $750, which judgment has been paid. At about the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wheeler v. Tyler Southeastern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1898
- Gumb v. Twenty-Third Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Helland v. BridenstineWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Henry v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Niemyer v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Cox v. SpanglerWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Cox v. SpanglerWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Richmond v. CampbellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
- Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co. v. Holt & JefferyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Elston v. McGlauflinWashington Supreme Court · 1914
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.