Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1977No. 44087PublishedCited by 165 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.

John Roberts, plaintiff below, appeals from a directed verdict in favor of defendant Atlantic Richfield Company (Arco) at the close of plaintiff's case before a jury. We affirm.

Appellant had worked for Arco since 1969 and since 1959 for a company purchased by Arco. His work record indicates he was a good employee and he was steadily promoted. In October 1975, appellant, at the age of 42, was involuntarily terminated from his lower-mid-management position with Arco.

Appellant brought suit alleging: (1) that Arco discriminated against him because of his age; (2) that the circumstances of his…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by165 opinions

  1. Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Harless v. First National Bank in FairmontWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Sheets v. Teddy's Frosted Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Dicomes v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1989

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API