Burlie v. Stephens
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered January 17, 1920, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant, in an action for personal injuries sustained by a minor struck by an automobile.
1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.
Suit for personal injuries. The appellant is the guardian ad litem of Marvin Burlie. As such he instituted this action against the respondent for the purpose of recovering damages because of injuries to Marvin Burlie, who, at the time of receiving such injuries, was twelve years of age. The facts are substantially as follows: The injury occurred at the intersection of J and South 18th streets, in the city of Tacoma. One Forrest Ligman, at the time of the injury, was, and for a long time prior thereto had been, driving a Ford motor delivery truck or carriage for the respondents. Immediately…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hartley v. LasaterWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Woole v. Washington Railway & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Bullis v. BallWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Scharf v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- State v. ArmstrongWashington Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by80 opinions
- Clinkscales v. CarverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- O'Malley v. EaganWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
- Lucero Ex Rel. Lucero v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Leftridge v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Callan v. O'NEILCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.