Legal Opinion
Tanpiengco v. Tasto
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 8, 2002No. AC 22350PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*818 Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendants,1 Christine Fappiano and Shoreline Real Estate Company, appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered on the third count of the complaint, ordering them to pay the sum of $5000 as a penalty, $15,000 for attorney's fees and costs of $545.55.2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
This appeal stems from a purchase and sale agreement executed on September 15, 1999, by the plaintiffs, Paul Tanpiengco and Sharon Tanpiengco, for the purchase of real property owned by Maria Tasto located at 281 Chestnut Hill Road in KUlingworth. The listing broker was Shoreline…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Gargano v. HeymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Ancona v. Manafort Bros.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Murray v. TaylorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Reader v. CassarinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Russell v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Advanced Financial Services, Inc. v. Associated Appraisal Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Miller v. GuimaraesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Tang v. Bou-FakhreddineConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003