Legal Opinion
Tang v. Bou-Fakhreddine
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 4, 2003No. AC 21539PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WEST, J.
The pro se plaintiff, Edward Tang, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered following a hearing in damages, after the defendant, Malek Bou-Fakhreddine, was defaulted for failing to attend a pretrial conference. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) concluded that he failed to meet his burden of proof on those counts of his amended complaint alleging violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., reckless indifference and unintentional infliction of emotional distress, (2) failed to award…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Montinieri v. Southern New England Telephone, Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Gargano v. HeymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- L. F. Pace & Sons, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Foley v. Huntington Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Chapman Lumber, Inc. v. TagerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Arnone v. Town of EnfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Whitaker v. TaylorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Travelers Property & Casualty Co. v. ChristieConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Ceci Bros. v. Five Twenty-One Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.