Legal Opinion
Gargano v. Heyman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 26, 1987No. 13084PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The plaintiff, Joseph Gargano, d/b/a Milford Plaza Laundry, occupied space in the Milford Plaza pursuant to a written lease agreement under which the plaintiff was the assignee. The defendant, Annette Heyman, is the owner of the premises. The plaintiff filed suit against the defendant alleging, inter alia, that she violated the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA); General Statutes § 42-110a et seq.; when she terminated the electrical service to the premises. The defendant counterclaimed for unpaid rent and waste. The trial court rendered judgment for the defendant in accordance…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Conaway v. PrestiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Collens v. New Canaan Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Triangle Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. SilverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Welk v. BidwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Gaudio v. Griffin Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Sir Speedy, Inc. v. L & P Graphics, Inc., Neil H. Blatte and Business Service Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Kilduff v. Adams, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Tingley Systems, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Norse Systems, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.