Legal Opinion
Miller v. Guimaraes
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 19, 2003No. AC 23032PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*762 Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendants, Peter Guimaraes and Guimaraes Construction, Inc., appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, Layne R. Miller and Paula Miller, in connection with an agreement between the parties for the sale of a lot and the construction of a residential dwelling on it. The defendants claim that the court improperly determined (1) that they breached the contract with the plaintiffs and that Peter Guimaraes is personally hable for the breach, (2) that they violated the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes §…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Macomber v. Travelers Property & Casualty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Schilberg Integrated Metals Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Bernstein v. NemeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. GalloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- McCann Real Equities Series XXII, LLC v. David McDermott Chevrolet, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Weinstein v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Centimark Corp. v. Village Manor Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Smithfield Associates, LLC v. Tolland BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.