Legal Opinion

Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 15, 2000No. SC 16201PublishedCited by 160 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether a general release and merger clause contained in contracts between commercial parties operates to preclude any future claims of contractual liability against the party for whose benefit the general release was executed. We conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, the unambiguous language of the parties’ contracts precludes any such claims of liability. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The plaintiffs, Tallmadge Brothers, Inc. (Tallmadge Brothers), and Robert J. Sabo, filed a ten count complaint…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Peter-Michael, Inc. v. Sea Shell AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Mulligan v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Bead Chain Manufacturing Co. v. Saxton Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Sicor Ltd. v. Cetus Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Nelson v. ElwaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by160 opinions

  1. United Illuminating Co. v. Wisvest-Connecticut, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Deming v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. Russell v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. Ex Parte Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Phillip v. Marsh-MonsantoSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017

155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API