Scott Paper Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
COLINS, Judge.
Scott Paper Company (Scott) petitions for review of an Opinion and Order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) entered August 13, 1987. We vacate and remand.
The Rate Proceeding
On December 30, 1985, Philadelphia Electric Company (PECO), filed a tariff supplement (Supplement No. 18) to its existing electric tariff (Tariff Electric—Pa. P.U.C. No. 26). This tariff supplement included an Auxiliary Service Rider, which contained proposed rates, terms and conditions of electric service to be provided by PECO to self-generating customers (i.e. customers who generate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Smith v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Lang v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pennsylvania Industrial Energy Coalition v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Montour Trail Council v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Armstrong Telecommunications, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utilities CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003