Legal Opinion
Lang v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 24, 1966No. Appeal, No. 65PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ervin, P. J.,
The present appeals grow out of a complaint filed by Frederic A. Lang and his wife, and Edward James, November 15, 1963, averring that Colonial Pipeline Company of Pennsylvania was about to construct, across their land and near their homes, in Chester County, Pennsylvania, a high pressure 30-inch diameter pipeline to transport gasoline and other highly dangerous petroleum products. The complaint averred the pipe was of insufficient thickness; that inspection pro*315cedures of welds and joints were unsafe, the line laid at an insufficient depth, and that any break in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Drexelbrook Associates v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Pittsburgh Railways Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Balazick v. Dunkard-Bobtown Municipal AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Pittsburgh Railways Co. v. P. S. C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kentucky Fried Chicken of Altoona, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Sanders & Thomas, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Litton RCS, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Scott Paper Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.