Legal Opinion
Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 17, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge PELLEGRINI.
Irwin A. Popowsky, acting as Consumer Advocate (Consumer Advocate), petitions for review of the June 21, 2001 order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission), approving the Joint Petition for Full Settlement (Joint Petition) filed by Emporium Water Company (Utility) 1 and the Commission’s Law Bureau (Law Bureau, collectively, Joint Petitioners).
On March 31, 2000, the Utility filed Supplement No. 4 to Tariff Water Pa. P.U.C. No. 5 to become effective May 31, 2000. The Supplement proposed an increase in rates calculated to produce $259,937 in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lyness v. Com., State Bd. of MedicineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Horn v. Township of HilltownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Arippa v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Emporium Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Emporium Water Co. v. Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Armstrong Telecommunications, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utilities CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003