Legal Opinion
Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 28, 1955No. Appeals, Nos. 256, 265, 266, 267 and 268PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, P. J.,
The Manufacturers Light & Heat Company filed with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission new tariff supplements providing for the following increases :(1) Industrial rates estimated to yield additional annual revenue of $1,597,907; (2) a rate applicable only to Lukens Steel Company, Coatesville, Pennsylvania, estimated to yield additional annual revenue of $187,967; (3) general service rates applicable to residential and commercial customers in Pennsylvania estimated to yield additional annual revenue of $4,-128,765. The total estimated increases amounted to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lindheimer v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Solar Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- United Fuel Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- United States Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.